User talk:Bgag

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Kurmanjan Datka, Och.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dakhma-i-Chakhan Mausoleum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dakhma-i-Chakhan Mausoleum 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dakhma-i-Chakhan Mausoleum 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Kurmajan Datka, Osh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosque in Yrdyk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower, Kyrgyzstan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dakhma-i-Chakhan Mausoleum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dakhma-i-Chakhan Mausoleum 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dakhma-i-Chokhon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This seems to be slightly tilted/rotated. --Plozessor 04:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done --Bgag 15:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of Chor-Bakr Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chor-Bakr Mosque 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chor-Bakr Mausoleum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me, but it could be sharper. --C messier 21:57, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horses in Jeti-Ögüz Rocks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Market, Almaty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chor-Bakr Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Like all your photos of this day, good composition, but just above the QI bar regarding the sharpness. --Sebring12Hrs 22:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombs at Chor-Bakr Mausoleum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zenkov Cathedral, Almaty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great horned owl 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Seven Bulls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Colors are a bit strange but the composition is good. --Sebring12Hrs 08:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, would be beneficial to have description of the object shown here. --Plozessor 07:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)✓ Done --Bgag 16:27, 1 January 2024
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosque in Yrdyk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Astana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. A tad too much sky. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in Astana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Great use of the national ornamental pattern. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyzstan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great horned owl 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Dungan Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in Karakol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in Yrdyk, Kyrgyzstan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jayma Bazaar, Osh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ak Orda Presidential Palace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silk factory in Margilan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tian Shan in Kyrgyzstan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower, Kyrgyzstan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeongnyeongjeon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bukchon Hanok Village 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Injeongjeon Hall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jongmyo Shrine 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Injeongjeon Hall 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modari Khan Mausoleum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach in Kurskoe, Kirghizistan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosque in Jeti-Ögüz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems a bit overexposed / too bright. --Plozessor 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done--Bgag 11:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach in Kurskoe, Kirghizistan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Welcome board in Kokand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modari Khan Mausoleum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jami Mosque minaret, Kokand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modari Khan Mausoleum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dakhma-i-Chakhan Mausoleum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hazrati Imam Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The summary info could be made more descriptive of the scene. --Tagooty 00:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of Hazrati Imam Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hazrati Imam Mosque 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Hazrati Imam Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alisher Navoi Opera and Ballet Theatre, Tashkent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Hazrati Imam Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hwaseong Fortress 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dongjangdae (East Command Post) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Changnyongmun (East Gate) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gur-e Amir 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks like the right side is leaning in very slightly. (The gate might be crooked, but not that much, see the wall behind it.) --Plozessor 05:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done You're right. --Bgag 15:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Gur-e Amir 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Gur-e Amir 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of Gur-e Amir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dongbuk Gongsimdon (North-East Observation Tower) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dongbuk (Northeastern Guard Pavilion).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Registan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boat on Geum River in Gongju 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, beautiful. Could add a CAT:Reflections in South Korea. --Tagooty 03:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Pond and Manharu Pavillion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juhamnu Pavilion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Highlights a little bit bright. --XRay 05:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buyongjeong Pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit overexposed? --Tagooty 04:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done --Bgag 14:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeryeonji Pond 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moyie Muborak Library Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 18:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Sher-Dor Madrasa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sher-Dor Madrasa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sher-Dor Madrasa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sher-Dor Madrasa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (maybe a bit undersaturated). --C messier 22:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombs in Shah-i-Zinda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of Tilya-Kori Madrasa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Tilya-Kori Madrasa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Injeongjeon Hall 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tilya-Kori Madrasa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentThere are artifacts after rotation (empty triangles) in both bottom corners --Jakubhal 05:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)✓ Done Oups! --Bgag 14:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 CommentThere is still a small triangle in bottom right corner. --Jakubhal 15:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)✓ Done --Bgag 19:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shah-i-Zinda 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main Street of Shah-i-Zinda 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum River in Gongju 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Tilya-Kori Madrasa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shah-i-Zinda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazi Zade Rumi Mausoleum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Octagonal Mausoleum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker at Jeongnimsa Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeongnimsa Temple 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not perfect picture from smartphone, but ok --Plozessor 04:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shah-i-Zinda 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok at 4MP. --Plozessor 05:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeonghwadang Hall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naganeupseong Village 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nangmillu Pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goransa Temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuman Aka complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Lovers Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Astana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shah-i-Zinda entrance portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of Khodja-Akhmad Mausoleum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Gate of Naganeupseong 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jangseung in Naganeupseong 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jangdokdae in Naganeupseong 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeongnimsa Temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly tilted (see the buildings in background) --Plozessor 04:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)✓ Done --Bgag 15:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeongnimsa Temple 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO very bright. --XRay 07:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)✓ Done --Bgag 15:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support IMO OK. --XRay 05:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jinmyosu in Gongju National Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Borderline quality due to smartphone, but given the poor light conditions and the perfect composition, I think it is acceptable. --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shah-i-Zinda 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern iwan of Bibi-Khanym Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Bibi-Khanym Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transport Tower, Astana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building on Nurjol Bulvar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern dome of Bibi-Khanym Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bibi-Khanym Mosque, Samarkand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street signs in Nurjol Boulevard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Bibi-Khanym Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Ulugh Beg (Samarkand) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulugh Beg Observatory 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulugh Beg Observatory Museum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulugh Beg Observatory 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bibi-Khanym Mausoleum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok at 4MP. --Plozessor 05:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazakh Eli Monument 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]